Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82C3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 82C3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200929
Uptime26 Days
Run DateApr 14 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 48.4
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 117
44% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 112
16% 116 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Legend(17AA 3FB4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 222 283 264 271 306 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.4% Below average
Read 131
Write 225
Mixed 212
SusWrite 251
47% 205 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 0.8
31% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 58.6
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 0.9
35% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.1
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 167
24% 167 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C3 Builds (Compare 220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback