Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A715-75G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A715-75G  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Azalea_FMS
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 224
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 514
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 142F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.17% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 7.4
5% 22.6 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.17%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 199 195 192 187 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 1035
Write 201
Mixed 223
SusWrite 208
90% 417 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 20.6
67% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 61.7
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 256
158% 168 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A715-75G Builds (Compare 2,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-75G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback