Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20171107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 12:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 221
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 609
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.6% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 82.3
50% 68.7 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 45.7
45% 56.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 32GB
25GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 64 45 45 66 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 298
Write 83.8
Mixed 119
SusWrite 56.7
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 7.6
38% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 45.2
44% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 100 95 106 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 55.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 102
48% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 19.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback