Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 176
2-Core 347
106% 201 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 1,160
111% 917 Pts
64-Core 1618
100% 1618 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 139
Parallax 187
99% 149 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 129
Splatting 93.8
90% 112 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 453 287 248 226 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 427
Write 445
Mixed 379
SusWrite 320
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 39.2
138% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 99%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
189GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 123 6.7 6.5 6.5 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 495
Write 422
Mixed 405
SusWrite 98.5
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 29.8
134% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 45.3
74% 144 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 91%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
308GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 432 427 415 324 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 473
Write 398
Mixed 408
SusWrite 345
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 27.5
133% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 41.4
69% 134 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 97%
Mass Storage Device 16GB
13GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
4.1% Terrible
Read 0.2
Write 10.9
Mixed 11.2
SusWrite 11.5
14% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M1Z3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 29.6
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 29.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback