PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds) |
Memory | 56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180307 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 31 '22 at 13:40 |
Run Duration | 267 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7900X-$325
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
126%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
151GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 314 312 308 242 253 MB/s
|
107%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1532 1510 1502 1541 1598 1633 MB/s
|
302%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 189 187 188 186 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 139 135 129 130 129 MB/s
|
60.5%
Good
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 16GB
11GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 18 19 19 19 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7820XIntel $195Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 192x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $204Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 147x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $325Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 129x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 88x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 73x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 41x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 117% - Outstanding | Total price: $620 |