Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-710  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-710
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151008
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 01 '22 at 09:46
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 310
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Acer(1025 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6
5% 5.57 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 10.3
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EZEX-21M2NA0 994GB
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 54 95 138 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 63.9
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 91
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
112% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 102%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 6998
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.1
5% 3.12 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-710 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback