Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '22 at 16:53
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 145
2-Core 276
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 737
75% 605 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84C8) 1GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 16.7
15% 19.4 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 464
Mixed 438
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 50.7
190% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 198
174% 259 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16U4R.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 17.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $348
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback