Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 05:30
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User EUR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 472
64% 476 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 109
Parallax 114
102% 116 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 105
Splatting 94.7
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2150
Write 2,190
Mixed 1,642
445% 1,994 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 77.7
275% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,532
DQ Write 894
DQ Mixed 904
756% 1110 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
282GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 464
Mixed 406
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 53.7
178% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
150GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 473
Mixed 355
95% 426 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 35.5
152% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 178
178% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 5 5.1 5 3.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 39.9
Write 38.7
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 5
37% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 73%
WDC WD10 EFRX-68JCSN0 1TB
307GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 39.5
Write 38.9
Mixed 31.7
46% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 40%
WDC WD10 EFRX-68JCSN0 1TB
45GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 41.2
Write 39.4
Mixed 29.8
46% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.07 MB/s
WDC WD10 EADS-11M2B1 1TB
202GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 36
Write 32.3
Mixed 13
32% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
12% 0.27 MB/s
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
39GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.6
Write 38.4
Mixed 22.2
41% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 77%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-22GXCB0 4TB
735GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.8
Write 40.2
Mixed 29.5
46% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 66%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB
13GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 35.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 0
33% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 27.4
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback