Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCEJ3M1E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemSony VPCEJ3M1E  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 02:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 152
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 201
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 410M
Sony(104D 908B) 1GB
CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 161 31 28 38 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 435
Write 351
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 79.3
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 1.1
32% 9.57 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 0.4
39% 86 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
134GB free
Firmware: 0006SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 69.7
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 57.6
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEJ3M1E Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Sony VPCEJ3M1E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback