Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 98.6 46% 74.2 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 150 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 39C1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	5.93% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 8.4 Parallax 10.7 6% 8.83 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 7.7 Splatting 7.3 6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.93% Great: 8%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
HFS128G3BTND-N210A 128GB 1,308 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,147 Write 21.7 Mixed 43.2 84% 404 MB/s	4K Read 136 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.1 210% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 71%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 803GB free Firmware: LCM2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 77.2 Write 117 Mixed 59.4 63% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.9 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 8.5 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	293x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	27x

RAM
M471A5143SB1-CRC M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBSamsungBench 28%, 2,091 samples	106x
RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBRamaxelBench 27%, 615 samples	39x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	34x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16