Today's hottest deals

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory13 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 14:13
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5430
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 85.1
41% 64 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 344
30% 257 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-XT
Sapphire(174B E390) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.9 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 236 246 231 208 189 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.4% Good
Read 258
Write 248
Mixed 236
SusWrite 226
55% 242 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 35.2
113% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 194
140% 182 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 4.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback