Today's hottest deals

HP xw9400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP xw9400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A1Ch
Memory10.9 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Quad-Core AMD Opteron 2354
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 32
2-Core 63.1
37% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 117
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 76.7
0% 45.5 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 52.3
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
36GB free
Firmware: 0030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 143 97 61 94 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.9% Average
Read 223
Write 188
Mixed 174
SusWrite 112
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 27.2
91% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.6
DQ Write 86.8
DQ Mixed 45.9
40% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 52 40 26 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 52.2
Write 66.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 36.6
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
120% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
271GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 88 90 92 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 93
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 89.1
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 49GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw9400 Workstation Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP xw9400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback