Today's hottest deals

Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0K9GNV
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 05:29
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User JAM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 95.3
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 158
71% 116 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 222
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.88% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.1
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.4
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.88%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$21
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DEM8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 99 95 98 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 51.5
Write 88.9
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 97.4
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.2
395% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 64%
KINGSTON SV300S3 120GB
36GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70% Good
Read 37.2
Write 34.4
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 40.2
50% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 11.7
1,028% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 19.3
DQ Mixed 15.1
1,221% 16 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback