Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '18 at 20:17
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 69.9
42% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 131
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.99% Terrible
Lighting 3.03
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 5.38
2% 4.56 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 6.22
4% 4.75 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.99%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$33
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 39 19 49 109 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 405
Write 319
Mixed 213
SusWrite 92.6
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 7.2
50% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 94.5
DQ Write 76.8
DQ Mixed 37.5
41% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 55%
KINGSTON SV300S3 120GB
6GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 78 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 91.7
Write 69
Mixed 102
SusWrite 73.2
114% 84 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 7.6
623% 8.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 26.6
DQ Mixed 18.8
1,605% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.9% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50-B Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback