Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 21 '22 at 14:52
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 119
2-Core 160
76% 124 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 689
63% 529 Pts
64-Core 688
43% 688 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.1.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 21.8
13% 21.7 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 24.7
18% 22 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Izoly 256GB 256GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 22 38 59 68 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45% Average
Read 344
Write 31.4
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 64.6
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 1.2
84% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 1.7
30% 72 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45%
Great: 233%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB
49GB free, PID 61b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 19.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 40.5
41% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG 500GB
121GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 31 34 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 28
Write 15.7
Mixed 15
SusWrite 34.3
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.4 3.7 3.3 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 4
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.7
9% 8.15 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
DDR4 8GB 3200MHz 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback