Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DH87MC
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJan 19 '22 at 09:50
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 161
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 402
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 3687) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 52.8
30% 42.6 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 40.2
37% 46 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xbory R500 120G 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 024L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 349 329 102 216 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 349
Write 380
Mixed 349
SusWrite 238
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 30.5
103% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 86.2
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 146
126% 179 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
874GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 112 112 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 112
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback