Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 92.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 204 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 731 66% 557 Pts	64-Core 1,172 72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% Asus(1043 8813) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	147% Outstanding	Lighting 204 Reflection 249 Parallax 176 166% 209 fps	MRender 259 Gravity 166 Splatting 133 146% 186 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 170%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.27% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 10.5 Parallax 9.8 5% 8.8 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 3% 4.23 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.27% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme 1TB 1TB 1,091 User benchmarks, average bench 215% 582GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0828A3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1308 429 498 153 389 199 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,721 Write 1,353 Mixed 990 SusWrite 496 254% 1,140 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 23.2 123% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 697 DQ Write 510 DQ Mixed 519 411% 575 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 296%
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 88GB free Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 128 128 106 104 58 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.8% Average	Read 248 Write 128 Mixed 136 SusWrite 103 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 15.6 65% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 106 105% 170 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 101%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 26GB free Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 195 193 189 189 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 461 Write 192 Mixed 227 SusWrite 191 59% 268 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 14.8 89% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 13.1 69% 161 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 2,357 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	MC Read 37.9 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 29 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 38.2 SC Mixed 27.1 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 124%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,971x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,893x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,613x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,572x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,333x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	1,137x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	1,278x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	936x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	934x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $1,073

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16