HP G62 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 5%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP G62 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1425
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '17 at 21:25
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Memory 8.1
1-Core 2.4
2-Core 3.7
4% 4.73 Pts
4-Core 29.4
8-Core 25
4% 27.2 Pts
64-Core 25.3
2% 25.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 1425) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2622
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.77
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.68 fps
MRender 0.71
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Clover CN-M320MBB 320GB
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 75.1
Write 83.1
Mixed 65.9
56% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.23
55% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 54%
Maxtor OneTouch 250GB
97GB free, PID 7350
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Read 15.9
Write 19.6
Mixed 8.31
18% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP594908-HR1-ELD 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.57% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 1.1
5% 1.83 GB/s
Latency 422
10% 422 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G62 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP G62 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback