Dell Latitude E6440

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E6440  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140218
Uptime33.7 Days
Run DateSep 08 '17 at 20:10
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 45
2-Core 142
53% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 262
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Dell(1028 05BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4170
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 396
Mixed 411
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 39.6
116% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 117
120% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 134%
O2micro SD 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: 0001
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 43.4
Write 13.1
Mixed 19.6
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.67
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.29
407% 2.82 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 42%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
814GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 40.9
Write 39.2
Mixed 35.3
49% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.22
78% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 45%
ST1000LM 014-1EJ164 1TB
532GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
Read 38.3
Write 41.1
Mixed 16
39% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
213% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GC64C8HB0NS-DI Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6440 Builds (Compare 1,765 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback