Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '17 at 05:05
Run Duration427 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 654
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 63
58% 67.1 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 72.9
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 1.5TB
274GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 76.4
Write 60.5
Mixed 70.6
15% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.13
4K Write 9.93
4K Mixed 5.36
26% 8.14 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 5.03
5% 8.55 MB/s
Richdisk device 344GB
36GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 69.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 74.6
15% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.31
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 4.8
26% 8.32 MB/s
DQ Read 7.42
DQ Write 8.03
DQ Mixed 4.78
4% 6.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Richdisk device 268GB
34GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 82.3
Write 61.6
Mixed 70.7
16% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.84
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 5.6
27% 8.49 MB/s
DQ Read 10.5
DQ Write 8.86
DQ Mixed 4.87
5% 8.09 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 23%
Richdisk device 451GB
18GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
Read 82.4
Write 61
Mixed 68.3
16% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.44
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 4.17
25% 7.92 MB/s
DQ Read 10
DQ Write 8.48
DQ Mixed 4.4
5% 7.64 MB/s
Richdisk device 451GB
10GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Read 55.5
Write 63.2
Mixed 63.7
14% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.19
4K Write 9.98
4K Mixed 5.03
23% 7.4 MB/s
DQ Read 6.51
DQ Write 8.72
DQ Mixed 5
4% 6.75 MB/s
Richdisk device 591GB
9GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 78.9
Write 63.8
Mixed 65
15% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.38
4K Write 8.32
4K Mixed 4.41
21% 6.7 MB/s
DQ Read 7.58
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 5.32
5% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Richdisk device 483GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Richdisk device 107GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $274
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback