Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KJ382AA-ABA m9250f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
5 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion KJ382AA-ABA m9250f  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 20:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$192
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 69
41% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 138
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Zotac(19DA 2132) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.83 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 92 67 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.4% Above average
Read 250
Write 194
Mixed 217
SusWrite 94.8
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 27.4
103% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 144
118% 169 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KJ382AA-ABA m9250f Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KJ382AA-ABA m9250f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback