PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 50.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130829 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 23 '21 at 21:45 |
Run Duration | 284 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2686) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ AGILITY4 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 172 183 183 180 185 MB/s
|
42.8%
Average
|
|||
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 131 129 131 134 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 126 124 125 127 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
9TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 126 123 126 126 MB/s
|
25.4%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB (2014)-$220
931GB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 94 101 99 97 MB/s
|
72.7%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba HDWR160 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 70 72 71 72 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
|||
69%
Good
|
||||
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 35 31 37 39 MB/s
|
12%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer 128GB
113GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 14 12 13 14 MB/s
|
8.2%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 530x |
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 273x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 181x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 122x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 116x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 112x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $1,163 |