Today's hottest deals

Tq-group TQMxE40S-AG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTq-group TQMxE40S-AG  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 13:42
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x6425RE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 37.6
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 100
35% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 197
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 3.7
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 100 81 109 89 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 690
Write 85.2
Mixed 264
SusWrite 111
62% 287 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 25.5
126% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 60.3
115% 234 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86%
Great: 157%
Generic USB Flash Disk 2GB
0GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.61% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 7
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 7.2
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
43% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.61%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.6% Average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 18.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TQMxE40S-AG Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Tq-group TQMxE40S-AG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback