Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8860
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 18:16
Run Duration425 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 47.8
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 68.6
32% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 214
21% 170 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$285
Asus(1043 8806) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 119
Parallax 140
82% 120 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.6
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 335 363 363 366 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 382
Write 343
Mixed 348
SusWrite 360
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 11.6
39% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 164
122% 162 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 125%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
265GB free
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 307 278 537 169 649 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,087
Write 932
Mixed 714
SusWrite 469
179% 800 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 17.2
94% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 329
238% 310 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 113%
Great: 310%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 25 25 25 25 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.6% Poor
Read 265
Write 24.9
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 28.1
20% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 9.4
43% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 47
DQ Write 57.2
DQ Mixed 15.6
22% 39.9 MB/s
Seagate Desktop 8TB
29GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 40 41 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 32.5
Write 16.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 38.5
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.4
158% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
722GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 175 171 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 68
SusWrite 172
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
121GB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 20.4
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 14.2
17% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
152% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 103%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.6 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 20.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 7.5
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 105%
Asmt ASM1352R-PM 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 18.9
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 7.6
16% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 119%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 20
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 13.7
17% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 22.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx Builds (Compare 5,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback