Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D16 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory29 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180425
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 15:30
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 108
46% 76 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 458
41% 345 Pts
64-Core 1,910
118% 1,910 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 158
Parallax 107
95% 127 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 114
Splatting 106
105% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 224 218 4.9 5 4.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 459
Write 410
Mixed 382
SusWrite 113
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 20.8
87% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 0.4
64% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 92%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
37GB free
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 133 124 119 109 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 426
Write 326
Mixed 200
SusWrite 114
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 10.9
57% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 78.2
DQ Mixed 22.4
37% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 55%
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
6GB free
Firmware: 1.03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 270
Mixed 271
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 25.4
83% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 186
154% 226 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 98%
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GB
105GB free
Firmware: 42B6SB7B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 454 467 523 523 531 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 627
Write 550
Mixed 545
SusWrite 495
125% 554 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 33.2
107% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 643
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 554
391% 504 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 110%
Great: 318%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
648GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 112 110 112 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 155
Write 116
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 109
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
15GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 81.3
Write 75.2
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 105
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 70%
Maxtor 7V300F0 300GB
24GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 53 50 45 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 53.3
Write 53
Mixed 35
SusWrite 49.6
35% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 40%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
173GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 38.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 38.4
46% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 21
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback