Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M LX  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 20:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3450
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 102
51% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 280
28% 230 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
MSI(1462 8A92) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 7.7
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apotop S3C 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0530A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 119 119 117 121 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 164
Write 119
Mixed 122
SusWrite 118
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 22.3
74% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 50.9
DQ Mixed 31.1
25% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
475GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 75 79 76 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 69
SusWrite 76.4
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 80 77 80 77 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 77.5
Write 80.7
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 78.2
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M LX Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback