Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 725 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 725 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8084
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20201017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 87.5
41% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 123
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 8084) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7.4
4% 6.5 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 6.4
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAY-1AH1ZABHA 128GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 153 158 158 162 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 368
Write 339
Mixed 259
SusWrite 170
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 23.8
84% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 149
125% 182 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x0B83] NT4GC64C88B1NS-DI Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 16
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 9.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 725 G3 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 725 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback