Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 745 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 807E
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 20:50
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 25.9
2-Core 79.1
35% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 121
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 807E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver:
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
2.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 3.92
Parallax 4.31
3% 3.81 fps
MRender 2.71
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.56%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 106 107 106 106 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 431
Write 236
Mixed 178
SusWrite 110
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 28.5
97% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 158
130% 187 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
127GB free
Firmware: PC4OC72E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 83 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 85
Mixed 51
SusWrite 82.2
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G3 Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback