Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 19:43
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 179
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 345
45% 341 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.2% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 32.8
26% 33.2 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 22.9
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 341 346 333 341 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 428
Write 348
Mixed 296
SusWrite 329
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 27.6
97% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 140
126% 201 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 130%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
535GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 146 151 147 151 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 132
Write 104
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 148
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 075D GR2400D464L17S/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback