Today's hottest deals

Asus M2N-VM HDMI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2N-VM HDMI  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 05:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core GS-5560
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 11.9
2-Core 23.9
23% 29.7 Pts
4-Core 41.8
8-Core 43.6
6% 42.7 Pts
64-Core 46.3
3% 46.3 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 337.88
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.4 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 8
Splatting 8.6
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250820AV 250GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ACH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 54 62 67 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 61.2
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 61.1
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-VM HDMI Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus M2N-VM HDMI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback