Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus WS C422 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory39 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 00:46
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2275
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 131
2-Core 268
85% 157 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 971
89% 744 Pts
64-Core 2003
124% 2003 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Dell(1028 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 134
Parallax 121
96% 124 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 106
Splatting 115
104% 129 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
485GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 429 600 428 437 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 2,201
Write 2,087
Mixed 2,000
SusWrite 482
379% 1,692 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 81.9
277% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,021
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 895
674% 906 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 244%
Great: 477%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
123GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 40 47 47 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB
146GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 460 459 459 460 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 457
Mixed 386
SusWrite 459
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 47.4
160% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 341
260% 351 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
409GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2047 2050 2063 2044 2059 1777 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,223
Write 1,947
Mixed 2,025
SusWrite 2,007
462% 2,050 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 88
283% 98.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,105
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 985
740% 992 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 344%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-3G2J3 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 48
MC Mixed 31.7
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 9.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS C422 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback