Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive345% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus WS C422 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 19:21
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2275
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 294
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,089
99% 832 Pts
64-Core 2,174
134% 2,174 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 2783) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.3% Poor
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 71.7
9% 47.6 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 55.3
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2170 2030 2071 2193 2100 1745 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
345% Outstanding
Read 2,241
Write 2,054
Mixed 1,941
SusWrite 2,052
467% 2,072 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 77.9
267% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 1,039
782% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 345%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2084 2080 2078 2092 2107 1914 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,114
Write 2,139
Mixed 1,947
SusWrite 2,059
466% 2,065 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 89.1
302% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,254
DQ Write 972
DQ Mixed 1,077
815% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 353%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-3G2J3 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 36.1
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 11
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 DEL4080 DELL U2713HM
Typical WS C422 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback