Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 419 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 71.8 1-Core 69 2-Core 135 55% 92 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 351 37% 298 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M3000M 1,726 User benchmarks, average bench 27% HP(103C 8109) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.94 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.7% Poor	Lighting 30.4 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 31.5 25% 32.5 fps	MRender 42.9 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 37.7 30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 7,823 User benchmarks, average bench 320% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 187 214 196 226 217 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 878 Write 624 Mixed 459 SusWrite 239 122% 550 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 21.5 72% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 288 215% 283 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 531%
Thnsn51t02du7 TOSHIBA 1TB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 115GB free Firmware: 57HA4103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 14 15 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 3417 Write 28.3 Mixed 59.1 SusWrite 13.4 183% 879 MB/s	4K Read 348 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 4.3 534% 118 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 249%
Thnsn51t02du7 TOSHIBA 1TB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 583GB free Firmware: 57HA4103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 13 14 14 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	288% Outstanding	Read 3,490 Write 27.4 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 13.1 186% 897 MB/s	4K Read 364 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 3.5 557% 123 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 288% Great: 249%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS7AFR8N-UH 2x16GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 46.7 MC Mixed 24.1 106% 37.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 24.7 SC Mixed 15.1 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	634x
Quadro M3000MNvidiaBench 27%, 1,726 samples	287x
Quadro M4000MNvidiaBench 34%, 731 samples	97x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	73x
MTFDDAV512TBN-1AR15ABHA 512GBCrucialBench 78%, 710 samples	58x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	53x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	76x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	72x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	43x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16