Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 17 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80D6
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, , 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 17:43
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User SEN-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 79.8
2-Core 167
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 382
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M3000M
HP(103C 80D6) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5269
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
28% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 32.5
26% 34.2 fps
MRender 44.8
Gravity 32
Splatting 38.6
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 649 697 679 692 635 615 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,048
Write 940
Mixed 873
SusWrite 661
198% 880 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 45.9
159% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 667
483% 629 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 159%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 916 504 506 508 508 506 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 277 269 269 252 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.4% Very good
Read 238
Write 207
Mixed 167
SusWrite 263
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 31.9
94% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 128%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$50
711GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 549 538 544 509 488 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 274
Write 206
Mixed 483
SusWrite 524
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 33.3
130% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 271
304% 514 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 111%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 G3 Builds (Compare 1,365 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback