HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory87.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '21 at 13:00
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 163
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 619
55% 468 Pts
64-Core 1,576
98% 1,576 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.9% Very good
Lighting 94
Reflection 105
Parallax 95.5
77% 98.3 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 95.4
78% 94.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 430
Write 406
Mixed 349
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 39.1
125% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 346
262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
202GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,694
Write 1490
Mixed 834
297% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 46.4
157% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 462
348% 470 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
16.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94
Write 127
Mixed 35.5
62% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.2
149% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 10%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: GX2M
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 150
Write 172
Mixed 73
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 131%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$219
2TB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 130
Write 122
Mixed 78.5
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
706% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.7
Write 98
Mixed 63.2
63% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
203% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11.2
Write 14
Mixed 22.3
12% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 63%
Generic MassStorageClass 253GB
207GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.2
Write 43.2
Mixed 52.8
71% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.1
278% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 36%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 161
Write 154
Mixed 93.3
168% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
206% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A-H9 H... 96GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.2% Very good
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 28.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback