Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '21 at 02:46
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 219
68% 125 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 642
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.2
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 83.6
46% 67.1 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 45.3
46% 58 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$46
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AADA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 495 434 455 449 434 432 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 684
Write 330
Mixed 398
SusWrite 450
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 35.9
103% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 451
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 155
140% 225 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 216%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$94
728GB free
Firmware: KA05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 127 126 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 59
SusWrite 126
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST4000NE0025-2EW107 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 215 221 217 220 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 210
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 219
135% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.2
280% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.M16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.4% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q270M-D3H Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q270M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $259
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback