MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 10:04
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 254
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 750
75% 608 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 54.4
50% 61.2 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 53
45% 55.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 907 78 64 81 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 670
Write 933
Mixed 780
SusWrite 349
154% 683 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 62.4
223% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 402
351% 504 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 142%
Great: 203%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
458GB free
Firmware: LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 107 106 96 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 67.9
Write 104
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 106
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 Kingston 9905744-077.A00G 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 10.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 4,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback