Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H57D-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20120928
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '21 at 19:13
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 159 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 406 41% 332 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.9% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 109 Parallax 112 93% 112 fps	MRender 139 Gravity 101 Splatting 94.9 89% 112 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 864GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 141 137 138 138 138 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.2% Average	Read 240 Write 137 Mixed 172 SusWrite 139 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 35.9 4K Mixed 26.6 83% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30.7 DQ Write 52.6 DQ Mixed 37.2 30% 40.2 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 125%
PI-300 USB 2.0 Drive 1.5TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 22 22 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 15.2 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 21.6 28% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 19%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 2,535 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 9GB free, PID 0243 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 11 9.8 9.1 11 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	9.18% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 22.7 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 9.5 23% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 69% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.18% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	42.4% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 12.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 12.3 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	37x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	32x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	30x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GBSeagateBench 117%, 6,074 samples	8x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	49x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16