Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 00:09
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 1,060
97% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,471
Write 2,251
Mixed 1,480
459% 2,067 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 84.6
283% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,001
DQ Write 1,123
DQ Mixed 1,010
775% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
26GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,738
Write 1,388
Mixed 636
276% 1,254 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 57.9
209% 78.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 809
693% 1010 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
88GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 924 927 926 609 608 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 922
Write 750
Mixed 615
SusWrite 820
174% 777 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 41.4
148% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 395
300% 405 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 151%
Great: 411%
Amd-raid Array 2 1.5TB
30GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 349 355 355 351 355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 235
Write 241
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 353
161% 223 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
330% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 169%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.4
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 39.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback