Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 13:34
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
31.1% Below average
Memory 44.3
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 104
42% 71.7 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 99
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
PowerColor(148C 2360) 2GB
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 28.2
20% 27.5 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 24.5
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0302A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 48 62 46 55 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 490
Write 325
Mixed 151
SusWrite 62.1
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 7.4
69% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 22.8
53% 108 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 110%
Patriot Blast 120GB
3GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 432
Mixed 348
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 35.7
128% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 156
138% 208 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 95%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
386GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 96 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 92
Write 71.3
Mixed 54
SusWrite 94.9
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX316C10F/4 KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.7% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback