Today's hottest deals

AMI Aptio CRB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '21 at 14:04
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3826
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Memory 28.2
1-Core 13.7
2-Core 25.3
15% 22.4 Pts
4-Core 25.8
8-Core 25.8
3% 25.8 Pts
64-Core 25.6
2% 25.6 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 46 46 28 50 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 32.6
Write 21.6
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 40.3
25% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21%
Great: 67%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Read 1.6
Write 1.2
Mixed 0.6
SusWrite 2.5
2% 1.48 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.5
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 265
15% 265 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aptio CRB Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMI Aptio CRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback