Today's hottest deals

AMI Aptio CRB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAMI Aptio CRB  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '16 at 12:01
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3826
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 46.3
1-Core 13.9
2-Core 27.1
22% 29.1 Pts
4-Core 27
8-Core 27.6
4% 27.3 Pts
64-Core 26.9
2% 26.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 0F31) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.81 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.22
1% 1.12 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS32GSSD630 32GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20130502 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 220
Write 39.3
Mixed 67.1
23% 109 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 3.03
45% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 53.8
DQ Write 36.2
DQ Mixed 4.74
14% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
SMI USB disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Read 15.6
Write 5.91
Mixed 5.88
10% 9.13 MB/s
4K Read 4.42
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
17% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H-I 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5
14% 5.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aptio CRB Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: AMI Aptio CRB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback