Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 20:43
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 171
74% 122 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 267
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.1% Good
Lighting 78.6
Reflection 108
Parallax 72.3
64% 86.3 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 57.8
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 145 128 61 130 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.8% Good
Read 259
Write 12.2
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 135
23% 107 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 26.1
129% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 91.3
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 82.6
77% 117 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
291GB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 167 167 167 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 161
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 166
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.4
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback