Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG3  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 01:45
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1620-$49
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 88.6
39% 63.1 Pts
4-Core 84.1
8-Core 84.1
11% 84.1 Pts
64-Core 87.7
5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V3800 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 210A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 4.8
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 256G 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08979
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 178 176 172 153 154 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 184
Write 192
Mixed 188
SusWrite 167
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 20.3
67% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 140
106% 145 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 103%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
44GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 0.1 14 8.5 14 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 16.5
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 8.8
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
90% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A00LF Samsung M04GD16P1600C11 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 4.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback