Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 22 '21 at 02:35
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 85.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 238
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 817
79% 651 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 22.9
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16.8
17% 21.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 369 368 272 287 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 428
Mixed 404
SusWrite 326
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 47.4
159% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 352
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 377 376 397 392 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 430
Mixed 362
SusWrite 386
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 43.8
158% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 122%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
47GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 376 375 397 392 391 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 431
Mixed 388
SusWrite 386
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 92.5
4K Mixed 51.7
175% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 24.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback