PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
Memory | 59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150930 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 22 '21 at 02:35 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 369 368 272 287 290 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 377 376 397 392 392 MB/s
|
106%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
47GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 376 375 397 392 391 MB/s
|
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 762x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 195x |
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 91x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 118x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 115x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $357 |