bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 02:51
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 460
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
AMD(1002 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 19.1
18% 20.4 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 11.8
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 13 422 169 113 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,082
Write 774
Mixed 568
SusWrite 150
142% 643 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 36.3
122% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 329
241% 314 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 104%
Great: 237%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 10TB
7TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 141 170 164 172 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 3.5
Write 50.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 146
36% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.1
59% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x46332D3130363636434C392D344742524C00 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback