Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 42 2-Core 125 54% 86.5 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 213 25% 196 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(174B E324) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Above average	Lighting 65.2 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 83.5 53% 73.9 fps	MRender 62.9 Gravity 58.6 Splatting 44 44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 36 34 27 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 47 Mixed 19 SusWrite 34.9 25% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0x46332D3130363636434C392D344742524C00 4x4GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 12.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,147x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,061x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325