Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 86.4
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,166
104% 880 Pts
64-Core 2,068
128% 2,068 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$391
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 60.7
54% 60.2 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
501GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1551 838 841 843 836 842 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 1,573
Write 1,742
Mixed 1,387
SusWrite 959
318% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 78.6
274% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 1,024
775% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 253%
Great: 276%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
490GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 299 297 293 272 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 425
Write 327
Mixed 253
SusWrite 293
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 29.2
98% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 187
143% 195 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 107%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
277GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 142 99 120 165 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53% Above average
Read 459
Write 372
Mixed 283
SusWrite 136
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 15.7
73% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 41.4
47% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
317GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 223 213 208 208 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 480
Write 415
Mixed 334
SusWrite 234
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 29.9
100% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 190
145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
403GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1513 1041 1108 1129 1159 1126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,528
Write 2,371
Mixed 1,715
SusWrite 1,179
436% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 90.7
305% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,288
DQ Write 875
DQ Mixed 1,065
799% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 316%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 39.3
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 36.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 4R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 27% 63 104 1 60 27" 2560 1440 ACR052F XB271HU A
History: Score 52: 6R 5G 7B | Score 41: 4R 4G 9B
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,262
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback