Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IU
Memory	11.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 06:47
Run Duration	283 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 26,507 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 73.1 1-Core 148 2-Core 294 91% 172 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 916 91% 743 Pts	64-Core 1261 78% 1261 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 16CF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 89 Parallax 25.3 15% 44.3 fps	MRender 12.9 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 18.1 14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 222GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 20 122 35 118 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 434 Write 846 Mixed 99.7 SusWrite 84.6 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 0.3 19% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 16.6 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 65.7 58% 81 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 185%
Sandisk Ultra 3D NVMe 1TB 13,576 User benchmarks, average bench 232% 347GB free Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1522 843 844 847 849 849 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 1,572 Write 1,785 Mixed 1,415 SusWrite 959 323% 1,433 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 59.9 188% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 51.9 DQ Write 202 DQ Mixed 78.4 74% 111 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 280%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Kingston 9905744-035.A00G 24GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	70% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 18.6 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 28: 2R 5G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
28%	24%	42	103	5	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP002D

History: Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 28: 2R 5G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IU_FA506IU

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	451x
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	120x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	51x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	346x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	276x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	165x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	111x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	61x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	88x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	81x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16