HP All-in-One 21-b0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP All-in-One 21-b0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87F9
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 01:54
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4025
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
22% Poor
Memory 33.5
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 96.8
33% 60 Pts
4-Core 68.8
8-Core 28.4
7% 48.6 Pts
64-Core 42.3
3% 42.3 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
HP(103C 87F9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.3
2% 2 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 52 60 58 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 105
Write 50.6
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 52.1
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 2.5
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 0.5
SC Mixed 1.1
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 16 2 1 60 20.7" 1920 1080 HPN404B HP All-in-One
Typical All-in-One 21-b0xxx Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One 21-b0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback